The Queue: Gee wiz

Welcome back to The Queue, the daily Q&A column in which the WoW Insider team answers your questions about the World of Warcraft. Mike Sacco will be your host today.

I’m on the fence about some of the Diablo III system changes announced yesterday, but at least half of ’em are pretty good changes, so I’m definitely continuing to look forward to playing my wizard (best class) when the game comes out some time this year.

Erik asked:

What do you feel the odds are that Blizzard will still add the older tier content to Raid Finder? Have them on Normal modes, after the nerfs it should be possible for 25 random people to handle these days. I ask because if there really is no more content patches left, that is a long time to go until Mists.

Couldn’t say. Blizzard devs have expressed a desire to hook up the Raid Finder to older raids, but with cross-realm raiding, you don’t really need the Raid Finder at all for really old raids. For stuff like Firelands or BoT or BWD, I’d imagine there are some issues with figuring out how many people you’d need for a “full” group — 25 is probably overkill with BoT and BWD when everyone’s in 378+ gear from 4.3. And would they need to have a Raid Finder difficulty mode as well? Would you just play them on normal mode? That would defeat the Raid Finder’s purpose as raiding with training wheels on. If it did have a Raid Finder mode, what item level gear would drop? 346 would make the raids even more pointless than they already are; leaving them at 359 would mean no difference from the loot that already drops in normal mode.

Lots of considerations; no easy answers. As much as I want people to see previous tiers of raiding, I’m just not sure it’s worth development time that could be spent giving us Pandaria, which will ship with all its raids hooked up to the Raid Finder.

Continue reading The Queue: Gee wiz

Filed under:

The Queue: Gee wiz originally appeared on WoW Insider on Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments